🔗 Share this article

Australia's decisive policy to prohibit social media access for those under 16 is creating waves internationally. Officials, campaigners, and parents are observing intently to see if this tactic will become a template for the rest of the world.

Across Europe Trend

Across Europe, a increasing group of countries are exploring similar bans.

• Denmark has announced a ban on social media for children under fifteen, with the prime minister declaring that smartphones and networks are "stealing our youngsters' childhood". Legislation could be formalized next year.
• The Norwegian government is set to implement a access barrier of 15, citing the need to shield children from the "power of the algorithms".
• The Irish government is working on a online verification tool to authenticate the age and identity of social media users. Authorities have indicated that an similar ban could be "one of the options on the table".
• In Spain, the prime minister has asked lawmakers to approve a proposal raising the minimum age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has floated the idea of a ban for children below 15, and a legislative committee has endorsed a similar move, including an overnight "screen time restriction" for older teenagers.
• The government in the Netherlands has urged families to block their youngsters from social media until 15.

Across the European Union, the EU parliament has approved a non-binding statement demanding a ban for teenagers under 16 without guardian approval is granted. Even though it highlights of the "compulsive" design of these apps, the move does not create enforceable legislation.

"An effective age limit is a useful first step," commented a leading parliamentarian driving the initiative.

Britain: A Watchful Stance

For the United Kingdom, the administration has remained open to a future ban, emphasizing that "nothing is off the table" but maintaining any action must be "supported by conclusive evidence".

Last year, interest grew behind a proposal to impose restrictions on social media use by minors, but it was in the end weakened. However, the administration committed to conduct more studies the matter.

Advocacy groups have expressed apprehensions. An organization set up by the loved ones of a young person who was lost after encountering dangerous social media material argues that a blanket age ban might not make platforms safer and could lead to a "dangerous transition" of harm when young people turn 16.

"The Australian ban is a reaction to the failure of the tech sector to build tools that are secure and fit for young users," stated a prominent peer.

The United States: A State-by-State Landscape

Stateside, action is primarily unfolding at the regional government level against a backdrop of federal stalemate.

• Utah requires parental consent for those under 18 to use social media and restricts late-night use.
• The state of Florida has signed a law banning children under fourteen from creating accounts on social media, though it is subject to legal challenges.
• Virginia has approved a rule restricting teenagers to a single hour of social media time per day, with extra access requiring parental permission.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have likewise passed bills demanding parental consent for teenagers to open social media profiles.

Even with cross-party agreement and proposals from some individuals to mimic the Australian path, a US-wide ban is currently seen as a distant prospect.

Worldwide Outlook

Beyond these regions, other countries are likewise taking action.

• Malaysia aims to prohibit social media for those under sixteen starting from next year.
• Brazil has increased the minimum age for the platform Instagram to 16.

But, international bodies strike a more nuanced stance. A major UN agency has warned that social media bans carry risks and "might have unintended consequences". The agency notes that online platforms can be a "vital connection" for isolated youth and that government action should not be a "replacement" for social media firms to invest in child safeguards.

Even as this worldwide conversation evolves, the policies of this nation and others indicate that states globally are less and less content to stand by for platforms to self-regulate.